Methods of using sustained release aminopyridine compositions

ABSTRACT

A pharmaceutical composition which comprises a therapeutically effective amount of a aminopyridine dispersed in a release matrix, including, for example, a composition that can be formulated into a stable, sustained-release oral dosage formulation, such as a tablet which provides, upon administration to a patient, a therapeutically effective plasma level of the aminopyridine for a period of at about 12 hours and the use of the composition to treat various neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis. A method of selecting individuals based on responsiveness to a treatment, including, for example, identifying individuals who responded to treatment with a sustained release fampridine composition.

CROSS REFERENCES

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/102,559, filed Apr. 8, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/560,894, filed Apr. 9, 2004. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/102,559 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

This invention relates a sustained release oral dosage form of an aminopyridine pharmaceutical composition that can be used to treat individuals affected with neurological disorders wherein said pharmaceutical composition maximizes the therapeutic effect, while minimizing adverse side effects.

The sustained release oral dosage form of the present invention may be utilized to treat neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, Alzheimer's disease and ALS.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a degenerative and inflammatory neurological disease that affects the central nervous system, more specifically the myelin sheath. The condition of MS involves demyelination of nerve fibers resulting in “short-circuiting” of nerve impulses and thus a slowing or blocking of transmission along the nerve fibers, with associated disabling symptoms. Treatment alternatives for promoting transmission along affected nerves have thus far been limited.

Potassium channel blockers are a class of compounds that has been found to improve the conduction of nerve impulses. As a result, they have become the focus of attention in the symptomatic treatment of spinal cord injury, MS and Alzheimer's disease. One sub-class of potassium channel blockers, aminopyridines have shown promise in the treatment of neurological diseases. 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), a mono-aminopyridine known as fampridine, has been found to reduce the potassium flow in nerve impulse transmission and, thereby, shows effectiveness in restoring conduction in blocked and demyelinated nerves.

Early studies of monoaminopyridines were conducted using an intravenous composition, comprising 4-AP. This was followed by the development of an immediate-release (IR) composition for oral administration of 4-AP, commonly known as fampridine. The IR composition consisted of 4-AP powder in a gelatin-based capsule and produced rapid peak plasma concentrations shortly after dosing with a time to maximum concentration of about 1 hour and a plasma half life of about 3.5 hours. The rapid release and short half life of fampridine makes it difficult to maintain effective plasma levels without producing high peaks following each dose that may cause undesirable side effects such as seizures and trembling.

Electrophysiological recordings from isolated spinal cord have shown chronic failure of action potential conduction in surviving myelinated axons, following a blunt contusion injury (Blight, A. R., “Axonal physiology of chronic spinal cord injury in the cat: intracellular recording in vitro”, Neuroscience. 10:1471-1486 (1983b)). Some of this conduction block can be overcome, at the level of single nerve fibers, using the drug 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) (Blight, A. R., “Effect of 4-aminopyridine on axonal conduction-block in chronic spinal cord injury”, Brain Res. Bull. 22:47-52 (1989)). Intravenous injection of this compound in animals with experimental or naturally occurring spinal cord injuries produces significant improvements in electrophysiological (Blight, A. R. and Gruner, J. A., “Augmentation by 4-aminopyridine of vestibulospinal free fall responses in chronic spinal-injured cats,” J. Neurol. Sci. 82:145-159, (1987)) and behavior function (Blight, A. R., “The effects of 4-aminopyridine on neurological deficits in chronic cases of traumatic spinal cord injury in dogs: a phase I clinical trial,” J. Neurotrauma, 8:103-119 (1991)).

An initial study in spinal cord injury patients was organized by Dr. Keith Hayes and indicated a potential for a therapeutic benefit, mostly at the electrophysiological level, combined with a lack of serious side effects (Hayes et al, “Effects of intravenous 4-aminopyridine on neurological function in chronic spinal cord injured patients: preliminary observations,” Proc. IBRO World Conf. Neurosci., p. 345 1991).

A recent study of fampridine in patients with chronic incomplete SCI was reported in Clinical Neuropharmacology 2003: Keith C. Hayes; Patrick J. Potter; Robert R. Hansebout; Joanne M. Bugaresti; Jane T. C. Hsieh; Sera Nicosia; Mitchell A. Katz; Andrew R. Blight; Ron Cohen 26(4):185-192.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition which contains one or more potassium channel blockers and which can be used in the effective treatment of various diseases, for example, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and ALS. Embodiments of the present invention are directed to compositions that include a matrix and a potassium channel blocker. The potassium channel blockers may include aminopyridines, for example, 4-aminopyridine, 3,4-diaminopyridine and the like, most preferably 4-aminopyridine. The composition provides for sustained-release of the aminopyridine from the matrix to maintain the efficacious and safe plasma level of an aminopyridine. The aminopyridine dispersed in the matrix is capable of providing, upon administration to a patient, a desired release profile. The composition may be used to establish in patients in need of such treatment, a therapeutically effective blood plasma level of the aminopyridine for a period of at least about 6 hours and preferably up to at least about 12 hours in the patient in a twice-daily administration while avoiding excessive peaks and troughs in the level of the aminopyridine. The composition may include a mono- or di-aminopyridine, preferably 4-AP or 3,4-DAP or a combination thereof, homogeneously dispersed in a rate-controlling polymer matrix, preferably including a hydrophilic polymer like hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). The composition of the present invention may also include one or more additional active ingredients and/or one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. These compositions can be used to treat various neurological diseases, for example, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and ALS.

Another embodiment of the present invention is a stable pharmaceutical composition that comprises a therapeutically effective amount of an aminopyridine dispersed in a matrix that provides a release profile of the aminopyridine to a patient that has a desired C_(max) to C_(τ) ratio. The composition may be used to establish and/or maintain in a patient, a therapeutically effective level of the aminopyridine. Preferably the aminopyridine in the composition is released over time so that a therapeutically effective level of the aminopyridine in the patient can be achieved with twice daily dosing of the composition. In a more preferred embodiment, undesirable spikes or peaks in the release of the aminopyridine are avoided.

Another embodiment of the present invention is a stable, sustained-release oral dosage formulation of a composition which includes a therapeutically effective amount of a 4-aminopyridine dispersed in a matrix that provides a release profile of 4-aminopyridine in the blood plasma of the patient extending over a period of at least 6 hours, preferably at least 8 hours, and more preferably, at least about 12 hours. In another embodiment, a stable, sustained-release oral dosage formulation of a composition includes a therapeutically effective amount of a 4-aminopyridine dispersed in a matrix that provides a therapeutically effective blood plasma level of 4-aminopyridine in the patient extending over about 24 hours.

Preferably, the oral dosage formulation of the composition is a monolithic tablet formed by compression of the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention. In preferred embodiments, the oral dosage formulation includes a compressed tablet of a therapeutically effective amount of 4-aminopyridine dispersed in matrix that includes a hydrophilic polymer such as HPMC. The oral dosage form of the present invention may also include one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.

The dispersion of 4-aminopyridine throughout the matrix imparts chemical and physical stability to the composition while providing a sustained-release profile. This enhanced dosage stability is most notably observed in compositions and dosage forms of the present invention having low concentrations of 4-aminopyridine, and stability is achieved while maintaining the desired controlled-release profile. Specifically, the compressed tablet formulation of the present invention exhibits superior resistance to moisture absorption by ambient humidity and maintains a uniform distribution of the 4-aminopyridine throughout the tablet while providing a release profile of 4-aminopyridine that permits establishment of a therapeutically effective concentration of the potassium channel blocker with once daily or twice daily dosing of the formulation. Preferably the therapeutically effective concentration released by the formulation extends over at least about 6 hours, preferably at least about 8 hours, and more preferably at least about 12 hours. In addition, the homogeneity of the dosage form renders it amenable to formation by simple and inexpensive manufacturing processes as compared with the multi-layered structure of prior sustained-release dosage formulations.

The compositions of the present invention may be used in the treatment of a condition in a patient that includes establishing a therapeutically effective concentration of a potassium channel blocker in the patient in need thereof. The compositions may be used for building up a level and or maintaining a therapeutically effective concentration of an aminopyridine in the patient by twice daily dosing. The dosages of the present compositions can be made with a lower concentration of the aminopyridine to facilitate restful periods for the patient during the day or night, depending on desired results or dosage schedule. Where desirable, the compositions of the present invention may be formulated to avoid large peaks in initial release of the aminopyridine. The compositions of the present invention when administered to a patient in need thereof provide for the treatment of neurological diseases that are characterized by a degradation of nerve impulse transmission. Preferably, the compositions are a stable, sustained-release tablet of a therapeutically effective amount of a mono- or di-aminopyridine, dispersed in HPMC such that therapeutically effective blood plasma level of the mono- or di-aminopyridine is maintained in the patient for a period of at least 6 hours, preferably at least 8 hours, and more preferably at least about 10-12 hours in a once or twice daily administration.

One embodiment of the present invention relates to a method of increasing walking speed comprising administering to a patient with multiple sclerosis an effective amount of a sustained release aminopyridine composition twice daily, wherein said effective amount is less than about 15 milligrams of aminopyridine. In a preferred embodiment, the effective amount is about 10 to about 15 milligrams of aminopyridine.

In a further embodiment of the present invention a method of improving lower extremity muscle tone comprising administering to a patient with multiple sclerosis an effective amount of a sustained-release aminopyridine composition twice daily is provided. In a preferred embodiment, said effective amount is less than about 15 milligrams of aminopyridine.

Another embodiment of the present invention relates to a method of improving lower extremity muscle strength comprising administering to a patient with multiple sclerosis an effective amount of a sustained-release aminopyridine composition twice daily, wherein said effective amount is less than about 15 milligrams of aminopyridine.

One embodiment of the present invention relates to a method of selecting individuals based on responsiveness to a treatment. The method comprises identifying a plurality of individuals; administering a test to each individual prior to a treatment period; administering a treatment to one or more of the individuals during the treatment period; administering the test a plurality of times to each individual during the treatment period; and selecting one or more individuals, wherein the selected individuals exhibit an improved performance during a majority of the tests administered during the treatment period as compared to the test administered prior to the treatment period. In certain embodiments, the method may further comprise administering the test to each individual after the treatment period, wherein the selected individuals further exhibit an improved performance during a majority of the tests administered during the treatment period as compared to the test administered after the treatment period.

A further embodiment relates to a method of selecting individuals based on responsiveness to a treatment, the method comprising identifying a plurality of individuals; administering a test to each individual prior to a treatment period; administering a treatment to one or more of the individuals during the treatment period; administering the test a plurality of times to each individual during the treatment period; administering the test to each individual after the treatment period; and selecting one or more individuals, wherein the selected individuals exhibit an improved performance during a majority of the tests administered during the treatment period as compared to the better performance of the test administered prior to the treatment period and the test administered after the treatment period.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a histogram to show the number of treatment visits at which subjects showed faster walking speed on the timed 25 foot walk than at all of the five non-treatment visits.

FIG. 2 is a graph of the average walking speeds (ft/sec) by study day (observed cases, ITT population).

FIG. 3 is a histogram of the percent change in average walking speed during the 12-week stable dose period (observed cases, ITT population).

FIG. 4 is a histogram of the percentage of protocol specified responders (subjects with average changes in walking speed during the 12-week stable dose period of at least 20%) by treatment group [(observed cases, ITT population]).

FIG. 5 is a graph of LEMMT by study day (observed cases, ITT population).

FIG. 6 is a histogram of change in LEMMT during the 12-week stable dose period (observed cases, ITT population).

FIG. 7 is a histogram of the percentage of post hoc responders by treatment group (ITT population) according to a responder analysis of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a histogram of the percentage of responders for placebo subjects vs. fampridine subjects pooled (ITT population) according to a responder analysis of the present invention.

FIG. 9 are histograms of the validation of the post hoc responder variable using subjective scales (observed cases, ITT population).

FIG. 10 is a graph of percent change in walking speed at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping (observed cases, ITT population).

FIG. 11 is a graph of the change in LEMMT at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping (observed cases, ITT population).

FIG. 12 is a graph of change in overall Ashworth Score at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping (observed cases, ITT population).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Before the present compositions and methods are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular molecules, compositions, methodologies or protocols described, as these may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention which will be limited only by the appended claims.

The terms used herein have meanings recognized and known to those of skill in the art, however, for convenience and completeness, particular terms and their meanings are set forth below.

It must also be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a “spheroid” is a reference to one or more spheroid and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the present invention, the preferred methods, devices, and materials are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated by reference. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the invention is not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention.

“Local administration” means direct administration by a non-systemic route at or in the vicinity of the site of affliction, disorder, or perceived pain.

The terms “patient” and “subject” mean all animals including humans. Examples of patients or subjects include humans, cows, dogs, cats, goats, sheep, and pigs.

The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, amides, and prodrugs” as used herein refers to those carboxylate salts, amino acid addition salts, esters, amides, and prodrugs of the compounds of the present invention which are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contact with the tissues of patients without undue toxicity, irritation, allergic response, and the like, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio, and effective for their intended use, as well as the zwitterionic forms, where possible, of the compounds of the invention.

The term “prodrug” refers to compounds that are rapidly transformed in vivo to yield the parent compounds of the above formula, for example, by hydrolysis in blood. A thorough discussion is provided in T. Higuchi and V. Stella, “Pro-drugs as Novel Delivery Systems,” Vol. 14 of the A.C.S. Symposium Series, and in Bioreversible Carriers in Drug Design, ed. Edward B. Roche, American Pharmaceutical Association and Pergamon Press, 1987, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The term “salts” refers to the relatively non-toxic, inorganic and organic acid addition salts of compounds of the present invention. These salts can be prepared in situ during the final isolation and purification of the compounds or by separately reacting the purified compound in its free base form with a suitable organic or inorganic acid and isolating the salt thus formed. Representative salts include the hydrobromide, hydrochloride, sulfate, bisulfate, nitrate, acetate, oxalate, valerate, oleate, palmitate, stearate, laurate, borate, benzoate, lactate, phosphate, tosylate, citrate, maleate, fumarate, succinate, tartrate, naphthylate mesylate, glucoheptonate, lactobionate and laurylsulphonate salts, and the like. These may include cations based on the alkali and alkaline earth metals, such as sodium, lithium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and the like, as well as non-toxic ammonium, tetramethylammonium, tetramethylammonium, methlyamine, dimethlyamine, trimethlyamine, triethlyamine, ethylamine, and the like. (See, for example, S. M. Barge et al., “Pharmaceutical Salts,” J. Pharm. Sci., 1977, 66:1-19 which is incorporated herein by reference).

A “therapeutically effective amount” is an amount sufficient to decrease or prevent the symptoms associated with a medical condition or infirmity, to normalize body functions in disease or disorders that result in impairment of specific bodily functions, or to provide improvement in one or more of the clinically measured parameters of the disease. Preferably, improvement in symptoms associated with the disease including walking speed, lower extremity muscle tone, lower extremity muscle strength, or spasticity. As related to the present application, a therapeutically effective amount is an amount sufficient to reduce the pain or spasticity associated with the neurological disorder being treated, or an amount sufficient to result in improvement of sexual, bladder or bowel function in subjects having a neurological disorder which impairs nerve conduction, which hinders normal sexual, bladder or bowel functions.

“Treatment” refers to the administration of medicine or the performance of medical procedures with respect to a patient, for either prophylaxis (prevention), to cure the infirmity or malady in the instance where the patient is afflicted refers, or amelioration the clinical condition of the patient, including a decreased duration of illness or severity of illness, or subjective improvement in the quality of life of the patient or a prolonged survival of the patient.

In addition, the compounds of the present invention can exist in unsolvated as well as solvated forms with pharmaceutically acceptable solvents such as water, ethanol, and the like. In general, the solvated forms are considered equivalent to the unsolvated forms for the purposes of the present invention.

One aspect of the invention is a sustained-release pharmaceutical composition comprising an aminopyridine dispersed in a sustained release matrix such as a rate-controlling polymer. The composition of the present invention is capable of providing, upon administration to a patient, a release profile of the aminopyridine extending over at least 6 hours, preferably least about 12 hours, and more preferably at least 24 hours or more. Preferably the aminopyridine concentration in the composition is a therapeutically effective amount, and preferably the aminopyridine is dispersed uniformly throughout the release matrix. A therapeutically effective amount is an amount of a potassium channel blocker, preferably an aminopyridine compound, that when administered to a patient or subject, ameliorates a symptom of a neurological disease.

When the compositions of the present invention are administered to a patient, the concentration of the aminopyridine in the patient's plasma over time (release profile) may extend over a period of at least 6 hours, preferably over at least 8 hours, and more preferably over at about 12 hours. The compositions may provide in single dose a mean maximum plasma concentration of aminopyridine in the patient of from about 15 to about 180 ng/ml; a mean T_(max) from about 1 to about 6 hours, more preferably about 2 to about 5.2 hours after administration of the composition to the patient.

In one embodiment, aminopyridine is administered to a subject at a dose and for a period sufficient to allow said subject to tolerate said dose without showing any adverse effects and thereafter increasing the dose at selected intervals of time until a therapeutic dose is achieved. In one embodiment, the medicament is administered to a subject at a dose and for a period sufficient to allow said subject to tolerate said dose without showing any adverse effects and thereafter increasing the dose of aminopyridine at selected intervals of time until a therapeutic dose is achieved. For example, at the commencement of treatment aminopyridine is preferably administered at a dose less than 15 mg/day until a tolerable state is reached. Suitably when said tolerable state is reached, the dose administered may be increased by amounts of at least 5-15 mg/day until said therapeutic dose is reached.

Preferably, aminopyridine is administered at a dose of about 10-15 mg twice daily (20-30 mg/day) depending upon the condition or symptoms being treated. The method can include scheduling administration of doses of the pharmaceutical so that the concentration of the aminopyridine in the patient is at about the minimum therapeutically effective level to ameliorate the neurological condition, yet relatively lower compared to the maximum concentration in order to enhance restful periods for the patient during the day or night, depending on desired results or dosage schedule. Preferably the method provides for the treatment of neurological diseases characterized by a degradation of nerve impulse transmission comprising the step of administering to a patient a composition of the present invention.

The formulations and compositions of the present invention exhibit a specific, desired release profile that maximizes the therapeutic effect while minimizing adverse side effects. The desired release profile may be described in terms of the maximum plasma concentration of the drug or active agent (C_(max)) and the plasma concentration of the drug or active agent at a specific dosing interval (Cτ). A ratio of C_(max) to C_(τ) (C_(max):C_(τ)) may be calculated from the observed C_(max) and C_(τ). A dosing interval (τ) is the time since the last administration of the drug or active agent. In the present application, the dosing interval (τ) is twelve (12) hours, therefore C_(τ) is the concentration of the drug or active agent at twelve (12) hours from the last administration.

Additionally, the formulations and compositions of the present invention exhibit a desired release profile that may be described in terms of the maximum plasma concentration of the drug or active agent at steady state (C_(maxSS)) and the minimum plasma concentration of the drug or active agent at steady state (C_(minSS)). Steady state is observed when the rate of administration (absorption) is equal to the rate of elimination of the drug or active agent. A ratio of C_(maxSS) to C_(minSS) (C_(maxSS):C_(minSS)) may be calculated from the observed C_(maxSS) and C_(minSS). In addition, the formulations and compositions of the present invention exhibit a desired release profile that may be described in terms of the average maximum plasma concentration of the drug or active agent at steady state (C_(avSS)).

Another embodiment is a sustained release tablet of a sustained release matrix and an aminopyridine, said tablet exhibits a release profile to obtain a C_(max):C_(τ) ratio in vivo of 1.0 to 3.5, and more preferably a C_(max):C_(τ) ratio of about 1.5 to about 3.0. In another preferred embodiment, the C_(max):C_(τ) ratio is about 2.0 to about 3.0. The aminopyridine may comprise 4-aminopyridine. The sustained release matrix may include for example, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, or other rate controlling matrices that are suitable for controlling the release rate of an aminopyridine for use in the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention.

Another embodiment is a sustained release tablet of a sustained release matrix and an aminopyridine, said tablet exhibits a release profile to obtain a C_(max):C_(τ) ratio in vivo of 1.0 to 3.5 and a C_(avSS) of about 15 ng/ml to about 35 ng/ml, and more preferably a C_(max):C_(τ) ratio of about 1.5 to about 3.0. In another preferred embodiment, the C_(max):C_(τ) ratio is about 2.0 to about 3.0.

A further aspect is a sustained release composition comprising a sustained release matrix and an aminopyridine, wherein said composition provides a C_(avss) of about 15 ng/ml to about 35 ng/ml. In a further aspect, a sustained release tablet comprising a sustained release matrix and an aminopyridine, said tablet exhibiting a C_(maxss) of about 20 ng/ml to about 35 ng/ml is provided. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of sustained release aminopyridine compositions and methods of treating various neurological disorders are described in co-pending PCT/US2004/008101 entitled “Stable Formulations of Aminopyrdines and Uses Thereof” filed Apr. 17, 2004 and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/010,828 entitled “Sustained Release Aminopyridine Composition” filed Dec. 13, 2004, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

The amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable quality aminopyridine, salt, solvated, or prodrug thereof included in the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention will vary, depending upon a variety of factors, including, for example, the specific potassium channel blocker used, the desired dosage level, the type and amount of rate-controlling polymer matrix used, and the presence, types and amounts of additional materials included in the composition. Preferably, the aminopyridine comprises from about 0.1 to about 13% w/w, more preferably from about 0.5 to about 6.25% w/w. In an even more preferable embodiment of the present invention the aminopyridine is present from about 0.5 to 4.75% w/w of the pharmaceutical composition. Accordingly, a weight percentage less than about 4.75% is desired. The amount of aminopyridine, or a derivative thereof, in the formulation varies depending on the desired dose for efficient drug delivery, the molecular weight, and the activity of the compound. The actual amount of the used drug can depend on the patient's age, weight, sex, medical condition, disease or any other medical criteria. The actual drug amount is determined according to intended medical use by techniques known in the art. The pharmaceutical dosage formulated according to the invention may be administered once or more times per day, preferably two or fewer times per day as determined by the attending physician.

Suitable formulations and methods of manufacture are further described in co-pending PCT/US2004/008101 entitled “Stable Formulations of Aminopyrdines and Uses Thereof” filed Apr. 17, 2004 and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/010,828 entitled “Sustained Release Aminopyridine Composition” filed Dec. 13, 2004, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

The release matrix aminopyridine formulation is preferably fabricated into tablets, capsules or granules for oral use. The rate of aminopyridine release from the tablets may be controlled by the erosion mechanism of the release matrix from which aminopyridine is released. In general, for producing a tablet on an industrial scale, the drug and polymer are granulated alone or in combination. Preferably the release of the aminopyridine from the matrix of the pharmaceutical composition is relatively linear over time. Preferably the matrix provides a release profile that gives a therapeutically effective concentration of the aminopyridine in the plasma of the patient permitting a once per day or twice per day dosing. Preferably the sustained release aminopyridine formulation for oral administration to patients includes from about 0.0001 mole to about 0.0013 mole aminopyridine that provides a mean maximum plasma concentration of aminopyridine from about 15 to about 180 ng/ml, a mean T_(max) of about 2 to about 5 hours after administration, and a mean minimum plasma concentration of from about 10 to 60 ng/ml at about 8-24 hours after administration.

The formulations of the invention are prepared by procedures known in the art, such as, for example, by the dry or wet method. The method selected for manufacturing affects the release characteristics of the finished tablet. In one method, for example, the tablet is prepared by wet granulation in the presence of either water or an aqueous solution of the hydrophilic polymer or using other binder as a granulating fluid. In alternative, organic solvent, such as isopropyl alcohol, ethanol and the like, may be employed with or without water. The drug and polymer may be granulated alone or in combination. Another method for preparation of the tablet which may be used requires using a drug-polymer dispersion in organic solvents in the presence or absence of water. Where the aminopyridine or its derivative has very low solubility in water it may be advantageous to reduce the particle size, for example, by milling it into fine powder and in this way to control the release kinetics of the drug and enhance its solubility.

The hardness of the tablets of the present invention may vary, depending on a variety of factors, including, for example, the relative amounts and specific types of ingredients used, the tableting equipment employed, and the selected processing parameters. The pressure used to prepare the tablets can influence the release profile of the aminopyridine into the patient. The pressure used to prepare the tablets of the present invention may vary depending upon their surface area and the amount and particle size of aminopyridine, additive, excipients, or binders included in the tablet. The degree of hydration and solvation of the components in the composition will also be important in determining the hard ness of the tablets. Preferably the formed tablets have a hardness in the range of from 80-400 N, and more preferably from 150 to 300N.

The effects of various matrices, concentrations of aminopyridine, as well as various excipients and additives to the composition on the concentration of the channel blocker on the dissolution rate may be monitored for example using a type H dissolution apparatus according to U.S. Pharmacopoeia XXII, or USP Apparatus II (Paddle Method). Clinical evaluations may be used to study the effects on plasma levels of various release matrices, concentrations of aminopyridine, as well as various excipients and additives. Plasma aminopyridine concentrations may be used to calculate pharmacokinetic data (release profiles) including apparent absorption and elimination rates, area-under-the curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (C_(max)), time to maximum plasma concentration (T_(max)), absorption half-life (T_(1/2)(abs)), and elimination half-life (T_(1/2)(elim)). Pharmacodynamic effects may be assessed based upon response tests, such as muscle strength improvement or reduction in spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury or other tests as would be known to those skilled in the art. Plasma aminopyridine concentration in blood plasma or cerebral spinal fluid may be monitored using liquid chromatography/MS/MS assay methods.

The drug delivery of the invention can utilize any suitable dosage unit form. Specific examples of the delivery system of the invention are tablets, tablets that disintegrate into granules, capsules, sustained release microcapsules, spheroids, or any other means that allow for oral administration. These forms may optionally be coated with pharmaceutically acceptable coating which allows the tablet or capsule to disintegrates in various portions of the digestive system. For example a tablet may have an enteric coating that prevents it from dissolving until it reaches the more basic environment of the small intestine.

The dispersion of the aminopyridine throughout the release matrix imparts enhanced stability characteristics in the dosage formulation. This enhanced stability is achieved without loss of the desired sustained-release profile. Preferably the release profile, which may be measured by dissolution rate is linear or approximately linear, preferably the release profile is measured by the concentration of the aminopyridine in the plasma in the patient and is such to permit twice daily (BID) dosing.

The pharmaceutical composition of the present invention can include also auxiliary agents or excipients, for example, glidants, dissolution agents, surfactants, diluents, binders including low temperature melting binders, disintegrants, solubilizing agents and/or lubricants as described in co-pending PCT/US2004/008101 entitled “Stable Formulations of Aminopyrdines and Uses Thereof” filed Apr. 17, 2004 and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/010,828 entitled “Sustained Release Aminopyridine Composition” filed Dec. 13, 2004, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

The active ingredient of the present invention may be mixed with excipients which are pharmaceutically acceptable and compatible with the active ingredient and in amounts suitable for use in the therapeutic methods described herein. Various excipients may be homogeneously mixed with the aminopyridines of the present invention as would be known to those skilled in the art. For example, aminopyridines may be mixed or combined with excipients such as but not limited to microcrystalline cellulose, colloidal silicon dioxide, lactose, starch, sorbitol, cyclodextrin and combinations of these.

To further improve the stability of the aminopyridine in the sustained release composition, an antioxidant compound can be included. Suitable antioxidants include, for example: sodium metabisulfite; tocopherols such as α,β,δ-tocopherol esters and α-tocopherol acetate; ascorbic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; ascorbyl palmitate; alkyl gallates such as propyl gallate, Tenox PG, Tenox s-1; sulfites or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; BHA; BHT; and monothioglycerol.

In another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention comprises a rate-controlling polymeric matrix comprising of a hydrogel matrix. For instance, an aminopyridine may be compressed into a dosage formulation containing a rate-controlling polymer, such as HPMC, or mixture of polymers which, when wet, will swell to form a hydrogel. The rate of release of the aminopyridine from this dosage formulation is sustained both by diffusion from the swollen tablet mass and by erosion of the tablet surface over time. The rate of release of the aminopyridine may be sustained both by the amount of polymer per tablet and by the inherent viscosities of the polymers used.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a stable, sustained-release oral dosage formulation which includes an effective amount a aminopyridine dispersed in a release matrix, and which, upon administration to a patient or as part of a therapy regiment, provides a release profile (of therapeutically effective blood plasma level of the aminopyridine) extending for a period of at least 6 hours, preferably at least 12 hours. In another embodiment, the stable, controlled-release oral dosage form provides, upon administration to a patient, a therapeutically effective blood plasma level of the aminopyridine for a period of at least 6 hours, preferably at least 12 hours, and more preferably at least 24 hours.

The dosage formulation may assume any form capable of delivering orally to a patient a therapeutically effective amount of an aminopyridine dispersed in a rate-controlling polymer. Preferably, the dosage formulation comprises a monolithic tablet.

Tablet weight will also vary in accordance with, among other things, the aminopyridine dosage, the type and amount of rate-controlling polymer used, and the presence, types and amounts of additional materials. Assuming 4-aminopyridine dosages of from about 2 mg to about 120 mg; tablet weights can range from about 50 mg to about 1200 mg per tablet, and preferably from 250 to 500 mg, and more preferably about 400 mg.

The dosage formulation of the present invention may comprise also one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients as mentioned above. In preferred embodiments, the dosage formulation will comprise diluents and a lubricant in addition to the aminopyridine unit dose and the rate-controlling polymer. Particularly preferred diluents is microcrystalline cellulose sold under the name Avicel PH101, and a particularly preferred lubricant is magnesium stearate. When these materials are used, the magnesium stearate component preferably comprises from about 0.2 to about 0.75% w/w of the dosage formulation, and the microcrystalline cellulose along with the rate controlling polymer and aminopyridine comprises the balance of the formulation. For example, a tablet formulation including a aminopyridine x % w/w, a rate-controlling polymer y % w/w, and microcrystalline cellulose z %, the magnesium stearate amount would be (100−(x+y+z)) where 0.2%≦(100−(x+y+z))≦0.75% w/w. As would be known to those skilled in the art, the amount of an additives such as magnesium stearate may vary depending upon the shear rate used to perform the mixing and the amount of such an additive may be changed without limitation to obtain a satisfactory dissolution rate or plasma level of the aminopyridine.

As used herein, the term “sustained-release” as it relates to the aminopyridine compositions includes the release of a aminopyridine from the dosage formulation at a sustained rate such that a therapeutically beneficial blood level below toxic levels of the aminopyridine is maintained over a period of at least about 12 hours, preferably about 24 hours or more. Preferably, the amount of the aminopyridine in the oral dosage formulations according to embodiments of the present invention establish a therapeutically useful plasma concentration through BID administration of the pharmaceutical composition.

If desired, the dosage formulations of this invention may be coated with a sustained-release polymer layer so as to provide additional sustained-release properties. Suitable polymers that can be used to form this sustained release layer include, for example, the release matrices listed above. As desired, the dosage formulation of the invention can be provided also with a light-protective and/or cosmetic film coating, for example, film-formers, pigments, anti-adhesive agents and politicizes. Such a film-former may consist of fast-dissolving constituents, such as low-viscosity hydroxypropylmethylcelluose, for example, Methocel E5 or D14, or Pharmacoat 606 (Shin-Etsu). The film coating may also contain excipients or enteric coatings customary in film-coating procedures, such as, for example, light-protective pigments, for example, iron oxide, or titanium dioxide, anti-adhesive agents, for example, talc, and also suitable plasticizers such as, for example, PEG 400, PEG 6000, diethyl phthalate or triethyl citrate.

The compositions of the present invention may be used for the treatment of neurological diseases characterized by a degradation of nerve impulse transmission by administering to a patient the oral dosage formulation of the present invention. Preferably, the administration is twice daily dosage of a therapeutically effective amount of an aminopyridine, even more preferably, 4-AP dispersed in HPMC. The administration can also include scheduling administration of doses of the pharmaceutical so that the concentration of the aminopyridine in the patient is at about the minimum therapeutically effective level to ameliorate the neurological condition, yet relatively low compared to the maximum concentration in order to minimize side effects. The compositions may be administered to a subject at a dose and for a period sufficient to allow said subject to tolerate said dose without showing any adverse effects and thereafter increasing the dose of said active agent in the tablets at selected intervals of time until a therapeutic dose is achieved in the subject. For example, at the commencement of treatment the active agent is preferably administered at a dose less than about 15 mg/day until a tolerable state is reached. The dose administered may then be increased by amounts of at least 5-10 mg/day until a therapeutic dose is reached, preferably less than about 30 mg/day. For other diseases the amount of the aminopyridine required to reach a therapeutically effective amount for treatment is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,952,357 the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Compositions of the present invention where the potassium channel blocker is a mono- or di-aminopyridine active agent are particularly suitable for use in the treatment of a neurological disease that is characterized by demyelination of the central nervous system, more especially multiple sclerosis.

In one embodiment of the present invention, a method of treating multiple sclerosis is provided. Compositions of the present invention containing a therapeutically effective amount of mono- or di-aminopyridine active agent may be administered to a patient in need thereof. In particular, sustained release compositions comprising at least about 5 milligrams of an aminopyridine, preferably 4-aminopyridine may be administered at least once daily. In a preferred embodiment, a sustained release composition containing from about 10 to about 15 milligrams of 4-aminopyridine is administered twice daily. Treatment of multiple sclerosis may include increased walking speed, improved lower extremity muscle strength or improved lower extremity muscle tone. The sustained release aminopyridine composition is preferably administered twice daily. In certain embodiments, the composition may be administered about every 12 hours.

A further embodiment is a method of increasing walking speed in patients with multiple sclerosis comprising administering to a patient at least about 5 milligrams of a sustained release aminopyridine composition, preferably at least about 10 to about 15 milligrams of a sustained release aminopyridine composition.

A further embodiment is a method of increasing muscle tone or muscle strength in patients with multiple sclerosis comprising administering to a patient at least about 5 milligrams of a sustained release aminopyridine composition, preferably at least about 10 to about 15 milligrams of a sustained release aminopyridine composition.

Fampridine is a potential therapy for MS with a unique mechanism of action. At concentrations of 1-2 μM or less, fampridine appears to be a specific blocker of voltage dependent, neuronal potassium channels that affect conduction in demyelinated axons. Fampridine has been shown to restore action potential conduction in damaged, poorly myelinated nerve fibers, and it may also directly enhance synaptic transmission. In previous clinical trials, treatment with fampridine has been associated with a variety of neurological benefits in people with MS including faster walking and increased strength, as measured by standard neurological assessments.

Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method of selecting individuals based on responsiveness to a treatment. In one embodiment, the method comprises identifying a plurality of individuals; administering a test to each individual prior to a treatment period; administering a treatment, including, but not limited to administering a therapeutic agent or drug, to one or more of the individuals during the treatment period; administering the test a plurality of times to each individual during the treatment period; and selecting one or more individuals, wherein the selected individuals exhibit an improved performance during a majority of the tests administered during the treatment period as compared to the test administered prior to the treatment period. In certain embodiments, the method may further comprise administering the test to each individual after the treatment period, wherein the selected individuals further exhibit an improved performance during a majority of the tests administered during the treatment period as compared to the test administered after the treatment period.

It is important to note that this embodiment selects subjects who show a pattern of change that is consistent with a treatment response, but does not define the full characteristics of that response. The criterion itself does not specify the amount of improvement nor does it specify that the improvement must be stable over time. For example, a progressive decline in effect during the course of the study period, even one resulting in speeds slower than the maximum non-treatment value, would not be excluded by the criterion; as a specific example, changes from the maximum non-treatment value of, respectively, +20%, +5%, +1% and −30% during the double blind treatment period would qualify as a response under the criterion, but would actually show a net negative average change for the entire period, poor stability and a negative endpoint. Post-hoc analyses of studies discussed in greater detail below indicate that we may expect responders defined by consistency of effect also to demonstrate increased magnitude and stability of benefit.

We have found this embodiment particularly applicable in our analysis of fampridine in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis. Clinicians who regularly prescribe compounded fampridine for MS have reported that only a proportion of their patients appear to respond with clear clinical benefits, and that, in their judgment, this proportion may be around one third. This extent of responsiveness may be related to the proposed mechanism of action, which is the restoration of conduction in demyelinated axons via the blockade of voltage-dependent potassium channels. Only a proportion of MS patients would be expected to possess axons of appropriate functional relevance that are susceptible to these drug effects, given the highly variable pathology of the disease. Currently, there is insufficient understanding of the disease to allow for pre-trial selection of potentially responsive patients. However, the existence of a subset of patients who respond consistently to the drug can be supported by quantitative observations in our own clinical studies discussed below.

Before treatment, the subjects in these two trials exhibited average walking speeds on the TW25 measure of approximately 2 feet per second (ft/sec). This is a significant deficit, since the expected walking speed for an unaffected individual is 5-6 ft/sec. Subjects in MS-F202 were selected for TW-25 walking time at screening of 8-60, which is equivalent to a range in speed of 0.42-3.1 ft/sec. Variability of functional status is an inherent characteristic of MS, and this can be seen in repeated measurement of walking speed over the course of weeks or months. At any of the three visits during the stable treatment period, 15-20% of placebo-treated subjects showed >20% improvement from baseline walking speed, a threshold chosen as one that indicates a true change in walking speed over background fluctuations. A larger proportion of the Fampridine-SR treated subjects showed such improvements, but this difference was not statistically significant, given the sample size and placebo response rate.

Given the often large variations in function experienced by people with MS, it is difficult for the subject or a trained observer to separate a treatment-related improvement from a disease-related improvement without the element of consistency over time. Consistency of benefit might therefore be expected to be a more selective measure of true treatment effect than magnitude of change. Based on this rationale, the responses of the individual subjects in the MS-F202 trial were examined for the degree to which their walking speed showed improvement during the double-blind treatment period and returned towards pre-treatment values after they were taken off drug, at follow-up. This subject-by-subject examination yielded a subgroup of subjects whose pattern of walking speed over time appeared to be consistent with a drug response. This led to the analysis illustrated in FIG. 1. This compares the placebo and Fampridine-SR treated groups with respect to the number of visits during the double-blind treatment period in which walking speed on the TW25 was faster than the maximum speed out of all five of the non-treatment visits (four visits prior to randomization and one follow-up visit after the drug treatment period).

The placebo-treated group showed a clear pattern of exponential decline in numbers of subjects with higher numbers of “positive” visits. This is what would be expected from a random process of variability. In contrast, the pattern of response in the Fampridine-SR treated group strongly diverged from this distribution; much larger numbers of Fampridine-SR treated subjects showed three or four visits with higher walking speeds than the maximum speed of all five non-treatment visits and less than half of the expected proportion had no visits with higher speeds. These results indicate that there was a sub-population of subjects in the Fampridine-SR treated group that experienced a consistent increase in walking speed related to treatment.

This analysis suggests that a relatively highly selective criterion for a likely treatment responder would be: a subject with a faster walking speed for at least three (i.e., three or four) of the four visits during the double blind treatment period compared to the maximum value for all five of the non-treatment visits. The four visits before initiation of double-blind treatment provide an initial baseline against which to measure the consistency of response during the four treatment visits. The inclusion of the follow-up visit as an additional component of the comparison was found valuable primarily in excluding those subjects who did not show the expected loss of improvement after coming off the drug. These are likely to be subjects who happened by chance to have improved in their MS symptoms around the time of treatment initiation, but whose improvement did not reverse on drug discontinuation because it was actually unrelated to drug. Thus, incorporating the follow-up visit as part of the criterion may help to exclude false positives, if the TW25 speed remains high at follow-up.

As described in Example 5, below, this responder criterion was met by 8.5%, 35.3%, 36.0%, and 38.6% of the subjects in the placebo, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg b.i.d. treatment groups, respectively, showing a highly significant and consistent difference between placebo and drug treatment groups. Given that there was little difference in responsiveness between the three doses examined, more detailed analyses were performed comparing the pooled Fampridine-SR treated groups against the placebo-treated group. The full results of this analysis for study are described in the following sections. These show that the responder group so identified experienced a >25% average increase in walking speed over the treatment period and that this increase did not diminish across the treatment period. The responder group also showed an increase in Subject Global Impression score and an improvement in score on the MSWS-12.

Additional features and embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.

Example 1

This example illustrates preparation of compositions of the present invention and their release of an aminopyridine. Tablets in accordance with the present invention having dosages of 5 mg, 7.5 mg and 12.5 mg respectively were manufactured at 5 Kg scale. Materials were used in the amounts shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 % w/w % w/w % w/w Milled 4-AP (#50 mesh)  1.25  1.875  3.125 Methocel K100LV 60   60   60   Avicel PH101 38.15  37.525  36.275 Magnesium stearate 0.2 0.2 0.2 Aerosil 200 0.4 0.4 0.4 Equipment Horn Noak equipped with 13 × 8 mm oval Tablet Press tooling press speed 42,000 tablets/hr Tablet Weight 386-404 388-410 388-406 Range (mg)   (96.5-101.0%)   (97.0-102.5%)   (97.0-101.5%) Tablet Hardness 200-262 179-292 150-268 Range (N) Tablet Potency - 97.1  99.1  100.2  mg/tab. (% LC) Mean CU (mg/tab.)/% CV 5.0 mg/1.0% 7.4 mg/0.7% 12.4 mg/1.1% CU Discrete Samples 5.0 mg/1.2% 7.5 mg/1.8%   12.3/1.1% (mg/tab.)/% CV Dissolution (%/hr) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)  1 28.9 1.1 29.2 1.8 25.9 1.1  2 42.7 1.8 42.1 1.6 40.2 2.5  3 52.8 1.4 53.0 1.0 49.8 2.1  4 61.4 2.2 61.8 1.5 60.1 2.4  6 75.7 3.1 75.2 1.6 74.8 2.7 10 95.5 3.3 98.7 1.4 93.2 0.9

Prior to blending, 4-AP was milled through #50 mesh screen using a Fitzmill® comminutor. The materials were added into a Gral 25 bowl in the following order: half Methocel K100LV, Avicel PH101, Aerosil 200, milled 4-AP and the remaining Methocel K100LV. The mix was blended for 15 minutes at 175 rpm, then the magnesium stearate was added and was further blended for 5 minutes at 100 rpm. Samples were taken from top and bottom positions for blend potency analysis. Weight and hardness checks were performed every 15 minutes by the check-master E3049. Discrete tablet samples were taken during the compression process to evaluate intra batch content uniformity.

Example 2

This example illustrates that the pharmacokinetic profile of fampridine in compositions of the present invention is altered by administration in a sustained release tablet matrix compared to immediate release and controlled release formulations.

There is a delay in absorption manifested by a lower peak concentration, without any effect on the extent of absorption. When given as a single 12.5 mg dose, the peak concentration is approximately two-thirds lower as compared to peak values following administration of the IR formulation; the time to reach peak plasma levels was delayed by about 2 hours. As with the IR formulation, food delayed the absorption of Fampridine-SR. The absorption of fampridine was approximately 50% slower following ingestion of a fatty meal, although due to the flatness of the absorption curve, this may be exaggerated value. Extent of absorption did not differ, as values for Cmax and AUC were comparable as summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Pharmacokinetic Parameter Values (Mean ± SD) in Studies Using Fampridine SR, CR, and IR Formulations: Single Dose Studies in Healthy Adult Male Volunteers C_(MAX) AUC (0-∞) Study Number Dose (mg) Fed/Fasted (ng/mL) t_(MAX) (hours) (ng hr/mL) 0494006 12.5 SR Fed 28.7 ± 4.3 5.3 ± 0.8 257.0 ± 62.7 N = 12 (PD12265) Fasted 25.6 ± 3.8 2.8 ± 1.3 269.9 ± 44.4 12.5 IR Fasted  79.3 ± 16.3 0.9 ± 0.4 294.2 ± 55.6 (PD12266) 1194002 12.5 SR Fasted 28.5 ± 4.3 2.9 ± 2.4 285.9 ± 37.8 N = 12 (PD12907) 12.5 CR Fasted 37.7 ± 9.9 3.6 ± 0.9 300.0 ± 53.6 (4n806) 12.5 IR Fasted  83.5 ± 23.5 0.79 ± 0.3  274.0 ± 59.2 (PS644)

Example 3

This example details the pharmacokinetic properties of Fampridine-SR in tablets of the present invention administered to patients with multiple sclerosis. Plasma samples were analyzed for fampridine using a validated LC/MS/MS assay with a sensitivity of 2 ng/mL. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameter values were calculated using standard methodology.

This was an open-label, multi-center, dose proportionality study of orally administered fampridine in patients with multiple sclerosis. Single doses of fampridine were to be given in escalating doses (5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg) with at least a four-day interval between administration of each dose of drug. Safety evaluations were to be performed during the 24 hour period following administration of fampridine and blood samples were to be taken at the following times to determine pharmacokinetic parameters: hour 0 (pre-dose), hours 1-8, and hours 10, 12, 14, 18, and 24.

Twenty-three subjects received all 4 treatments, and one subject received only 3 treatments; data from all treatments were analyzed. Dose-dependent parameters (e.g., peak plasma concentration and areas-under-the curve) were normalized to a 10 mg dose for among-dose comparisons. Overall observed time of the peak plasma concentration (mean and its 95% confidence interval) was 3.75 (3.52, 3.98) h, observed peak plasma fampridine concentration (normalized to a 10 mg dose) was 24.12 (23.8, 26.6) ng/ml, area-under-the-concentration-time curve (normalized to a 10 mg dose) was estimated to be 254 (238, 270) ng·h/ml, extrapolated area-under-the-concentration-time curve (normalized to a 10 mg dose) was 284 (266, 302) ng·h/ml, terminal rate constant equaled 0.14 (0.13, 0.15) h⁻¹, terminal half-life was 5.47 (5.05, 5.89) h and clearance divided by bioavailability (CL/F) was equal to 637 (600, 674) ml/min.

Dizziness was the most common treatment-related adverse event. Other treatment related adverse events included amblyopia, asthenia, headache, and ataxia. There were no clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values, ECG parameters, vital signs, physical examination findings, or neurological examination findings noted over the course of this study.

When the plasma concentrations of fampridine were normalized to the 10.0 mg dose levels, there were no significant differences between any pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC, C_(max), t_(1/2)) in the 5-20 mg dose range. Fampridine was well tolerated at the doses used in this study. Dose-normalized (to a 10 mg dose) pharmacokinetic parameter values are summarized in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Dose-Normalized (at 10 mg) Pharmacokinetic Parameter Values (Mean ± SEM) Following Single Oral Administration of Fampridine-SR to Patients with MS. C_(MAX)- AUC- Dose norm t_(MAX) norm t_(1/2) Cl/F (mg) (ng/mL) (hours) (ng hr/mL) (hours) (mL/min)  5 26.2 ± 0.6 3.9 ± 0.2 244.2 ± 9.4 5.8 ± 0.5 619.8 ± 36.2 (n = 24) 10 25.2 ± 0.7 3.9 ± 0.3 252.2 ± 7.8 5.6 ± 0.4 641.4 ± 39.1 (n = 24) 15 24.6 ± 0.7 3.6 ± 0.3 263.0 ± 7.4 5.5 ± 0.4 632.4 ± 39.0 (n = 24) 20 24.6 ± 0.8 3.6 ± 0.3 255.6 ± 6.9 5.1 ± 0.3 653.9 ± 37.1 (n = 23)

Example 4

This example describes the results of an open-label study to assess the steady state pharmacokinetics of orally administered fampridine (4-aminopyridine) compositions of the present invention in subjects with Multiple Sclerosis. This study was an open-label multiple dose study of Fampridine-SR intended to assess steady state pharmacokinetics in 20 patients with MS who previously completed the study summarized in Table 4. Fampridine-SR (40 mg/day) was administered as two 20 mg doses, given as one morning and one evening dose for 13 consecutive days, with a single administration of 20 mg on Day 14. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected on Days 1, 7/8, and 14/15 at the following intervals: immediately prior to drug administration (baseline), hourly for the first 8 hours, and 10, 12, and 24 hours post-dose. Additional blood samples were collected 14, 18, and 20 hours post-dose on Day 14, and 30 and 36 hours post-dose on Day 15.

Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates following the first dose in these patients in this study on Day 1 were comparable to those determined when they participated in the study summarized in Table 4. No significant difference in T_(max) was detected among the four means (Single dose=3.76 h; Day 1=3.78 h; Day 8=3.33 h; Day 15=3.25 h). C_(max) and C_(max)/C_(τ) on Days 8 (C_(max)=66.7 ng/ml) and 15 (C_(max)=62.6 ng/ml) were significantly greater than those of the single dose treatment and of Day 1 (C_(max)=48.6 ng/ml), reflecting accumulation of the drug with multiple dosing.

There was no significant difference among the four occasions with regard to either T or C and no difference in C_(max), C_(max)/C_(τ), CL/F or AUC_(0-τ) between Days 8 and 15. Further AUC on Days 8 and 15 did not differ significantly from total AUC with single dose treatment. Likewise, the estimates of CL/F on Days 8 and 15 and of λ and T_(1/2) on Day 15 did not differ significantly from those with single dose.

Steady-state was attained by Day 7/8 as evidence by the lack of differences in C_(max) or AUC between Days 7/8 and 14/15; there was no apparent unexpected accumulation. Likewise, the estimates of Cl/F on Days 7/8 and 14/15 of and of T_(1/2) on Day 14/15 did not differ significantly from those given a single dose. On the final day of dosing, mean C_(max) was 62.6 ng/mL, occurring 3.3 hours post-dose. The T_(1/2) was 5.8 hours. These values are similar to those observed in patients with chronic SCI receiving similar doses of this formulation. These results are summarized in Table 4.

TABLE 4 Pharmacokinetic Parameter Values (Mean and 95% CI) Following Multiple Oral Doses of Fampridine-SR (40 mg/day) to 20 Patients with MS. Parameter C_(MAX) t_(MAX) AUC₍₀₋₁₂₎ t_(1/2) Cl/F Day (ng/mL) (hours) (ng hr/mL) (hours) (mL/min) Day 1 48.6 3.8 NE NE NE (42.0, 55.3) (3.2, 4.3) Day 7/8 66.7 3.3 531 NE 700 (57.5, 76.0) (2.8, 3.9) (452, 610) (557, 884) Day 62.6 3.3 499 5.8 703 14/15 (55.7, 69.4) (2.6, 3.9) (446, 552) (5.0, 6.6) (621, 786)

Dizziness was the most common treatment-related adverse event. Other treatment-related adverse events that occurred included nausea, ataxia, insomnia, and tremor. There were no clinically significant changes in mean clinical laboratory values, vital signs, or physical examination findings from baseline to last visit. There were no apparent clinically significant changes in corrected QT intervals or QRS amplitudes after administration of fampridine.

Fampridine was well tolerated in subjects with multiple sclerosis who receive twice daily doses (20 mg/dose) of fampridine for two weeks. A significant increase was observed in C_(max), and C_(max)/C_(τ) on Days 8 and 15 relative to those on Day 1 and with single dose treatment, reflecting accumulation of fampridine with multiple dosing. A lack of significant differences in C_(max), C_(max)/C_(τ), CL/F or AUC_(0-τ) between Days 8 and 15 suggest that near steady-state is reached by Day 8. There was no evidence of significant changes in pharmacokinetics during a two-week period of multiple dosing with fampridine.

Example 5

This example provides an embodiment of a method of treating subjects with a sustained release fampridine formulation and a responder analysis of the present invention. This was a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, 20-week treatment study in 206 subjects diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. This study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of three dose levels of Fampridine-SR, 10 mg b.i.d., 15 mg b.i.d., and 20 mg b.i.d. in subjects with clinically definite MS. The primary efficacy endpoint was an increase, relative to baseline, in walking speed, on the Timed 25 Foot Walk. Secondary efficacy measurements included lower extremity manual muscle testing in four groups of lower extremity muscles (hip flexors, knee flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors); the 9-Hole Peg Test and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT 3″); the Ashworth score for spasticity; Spasm Frequency/Severity scores; as well as a Clinician's (CGI) and Subject's (SGI) Global Impressions, a Subject's Global Impression (SGI), the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI) and the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12).

At the first visit (Visit 0) subjects were to enter into a two-week single-blind placebo run-in period for the purpose of establishing baseline levels of function. At Visit 2 subjects were to be randomized to one of four treatment groups (Placebo or Fampridine-SR 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg) and begin two weeks of double-blind dose-escalation in the active drug treatment groups (B, C and D). Group A were to receive placebo throughout the study. Subjects in the 10 mg (Group B) arm of the study took a dose of 10 mg approximately every 12 hours during both weeks of the escalation phase. The 15 mg (Group C) and 20 mg (Group D) dose subjects took a dose of 10 mg approximately every 12 hours during the first week of the escalation phase and titrated up to 15 mg b.i.d. in the second week. Subjects were to be instructed to adhere to an “every 12 hour” dosing schedule. Each subject was advised to take the medication at approximately the same time each day throughout the study; however, different subjects were on differing medication schedules (e.g., 7 AM and 7 PM; or 9 AM and 9 PM). After two weeks, the subjects were to return to the clinic at Visit 3 for the start of the stable dose treatment period. The first dose of the double-blind treatment phase at the final target dose (placebo b.i.d. for the Group A, 10 mg b.i.d. for Group B, 15 mg b.i.d. for Group C, and 20 mg b.i.d. for Group D) was taken in the evening following Study Visit 4. Subjects were to be assessed five times during the 12-week treatment period. Following the 12-week treatment phase there was to be a one-week down titration starting at Visit 9. During this down-titration period, group B was to remain stable at 10 mg b.i.d. and Group C was to be titrated to 10 mg b.i.d., while group D was to have a change in the level of dose during the week (15 mg b.i.d. for the first three days and 10 mg b.i.d. for the last four days). At the end of the down titration period at Visit 10, subjects were to enter a two-week washout period where they did not receive any study medication. The last visit (Visit 11) was to be scheduled two weeks after the last dosing day (end of the downward titration). Plasma samples were collected at each study site visit other than Study Visit 0.

The primary measure of efficacy was improvement in average walking speed, relative to the baseline period (placebo run-in), using the Timed 25 Foot Walk from the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Score (MSFC). This is a quantitative measure of lower extremity function. Subjects were instructed to use whatever ambulation aids they normally use and to walk as quickly as they could from one end to the other end of a clearly marked 25-foot course. Other efficacy measures included the LEMMT, to estimate muscle strength bilaterally in four groups of muscles: hip flexors, knee flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors. The test was performed at the Screening Visit and at Study Visits 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 11. The strength of each muscle group was rated on the modified BMRC scale: 5=Normal muscle strength; 4.5=Voluntary movement against major resistance applied by the examiner, but not normal; 4=Voluntary movement against moderate resistance applied by the examiner; 3.5=Voluntary movement against mild resistance applied by the examiner; 3=Voluntary movement against gravity but not resistance; 2=Voluntary movement present but not able to overcome gravity; 1=Visible or palpable contraction of muscle but without limb movement; and 0=Absence of any voluntary contraction. Spasticity in each subject was assessed using the Ashworth Spasticity Score. The Ashworth Spasticity Exam was performed and recorded at the Screening Visit and at Study Visits 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 11.

Protocol Specified Responder Analysis. To supplement the primary analysis, a categorical “responder” analysis was also conducted. Successful response was defined for each subject as improvement in walking speed (percent change from baseline) of at least 20%. Subjects who dropped out prior to the stable dose period were considered non-responders. The proportions of protocol specified responders were compared among treatment groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, controlling for center.

Post hoc analysis of this study suggested that a relatively highly selective criterion for a likely treatment responder would be a subject with a faster walking speed for at least three visits during the double blind treatment period as compared to the maximum value among a set of five non-treatment visits (four before treatment and one after discontinuation of treatment). The four visits before initiation of double-blind treatment provided an initial baseline against which to measure the consistency of response during the four double-blind treatment visits. The inclusion of the follow-up visit as an additional component of the comparison was useful primarily in excluding those subjects who may be false positives, i.e., did not show the expected loss of improvement after coming off the drug. Treatment differences in the proportion of theses post hoc responders were analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test, controlling for center.

To validate the clinical meaningfulness of the post hoc responder variable, (post hoc) responders were compared against the (post hoc) non-responders, on the subjective variables: (i) Change from baseline in MSWS-12 over the double-blind; (ii) SGI over the double-blind; and (iii) Change from baseline in the CGI over the double-blind; to determine if subjects with consistently improved walking speeds during the double-blind could perceive improvement relative to those subjects who did not have consistently improved walking speeds. For the subjective variables, differences between responder status classification (responder or non-responder) were compared using an ANOVA model with effects for responder status and center.

Results. A total of 206 subjects were randomized into the study: 47 were assigned to placebo, 52 to 10 mg bid Fampridine-SR (10 mg bid), 50 to 15 mg bid Fampridine-SR (15 mg bid), and 57 to 20 mg bid Fampridine-SR (20 mg bid). The disposition of subjects is presented in Table 5 below.

TABLE 5 Summary of subject disposition (all randomized population) Treatment Group: N (%) Placebo 10 mg bid 15 mg bid 20 mg bid Total Subjects Randomized 47 52 50 57 206 Took at Least One Dose 47 (100%) 52 (100%)  50 (100%) 57 (100%) 206 (100%) (Included in Safety Analysis) ITT Population 47 (100%) 51 (98.1%) 50 (100%) 57 (100%)  205 (99.5%) Discontinued Subjects  2 (4.3%) 2 (3.8%)  1 (2.0%)   6 (10.5%)  11 (5.3%) Note: Percentages are based on the number of randomized subjects.

All 206 randomized subjects took at least one dose of study medication and were included in the safety population. One subject (subject#010/07 10 mg bid group) was excluded from the ITT population (lost to follow-up after 8 days of placebo run-in). A total of 11 subjects discontinued from the study.

The population consisted of 63.6% females and 36.4% males. The majority of the subjects were Caucasian (92.2%), followed by Black (4.9%), Hispanic (1.5%), those classified as ‘Other’ (1.0%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (0.5%). The mean age, weight, and height of the subjects were 49.8 years (range: 28-69 years), 74.44 kilograms (range: 41.4-145.5 kilograms), and 168.84 centimeters (range: 137.2-200.7 centimeters), respectively. Most of the subjects (52.4%) had a diagnosis type of secondary progressive with about equal amounts of relapsing remitting (22.8%) and primary progressive (24.8%) subjects. The mean duration of disease was 12.00 years (range: 0.1-37.5 years) while the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at screening was 5.77 units (range: 2.5-6.5 units). The treatment groups were comparable with respect to all baseline demographic and disease characteristic variables.

Results for the key efficacy variables at baseline for the ITT population are further summarized in Table 6 below.

TABLE 6 Summary of key efficacy variables at baseline (ITT population) Treatment Group: Mean (SD) placebo 10 mg bid 15 mg bid 20 mg bid Treatment, Parameter N = 47 N = 51 N = 50 N = 57 p-value Walking Speed (ft/sec) 1.87 (0.902) 1.94 (0.874) 1.99 (0.877) 2.04 (0.811) 0.752 LEMMT 4.05 (0.690) 3.98 (0.661) 4.00 (0.737) 3.98 (0.634) 0.964 SGI 4.38 (0.795)  4.32 (0.999)* 4.56 (1.110) 4.25 (0.969) 0.413 MSWS-12 75.71 (16.566) 76.31 (16.186) 74.60 (17.671) 76.83 (18.124) 0.923 *One subject did not have a baseline value.

With respect to the 205 subjects in the ITT population, mean values for baseline walking speed, LEEMT, SGI, and MSWS-12 were approximately 2 feet per second, 4 units, 4.5 units, and 76 units, respectively. The treatment groups were comparable with respect to these variables as well as all the other efficacy variables at baseline.

Descriptive statistics for the average walking speed (ft/sec) by study day based on the Timed 25-Foot Walk are presented in Table 7 and FIG. 2. The timed 25 foot walk showed a trend toward increased speed during the stable dose period for all three dose groups, though the average improvement declined during the treatment period.

TABLE 7 Average walking speeds (ft/sec) by study day (observed cases, ITT population) Summary Statistics Over Time Study day Treat- titra- 1st 2nd 3rd follow- ment base tion stbl stbl stbl up placebo Mean 1.87 1.89 1.90 1.89 1.89 1.86 (SD) (0.902) (0.876) (0.908) (0.891) (0.914) (0.933) N# 47 47 46 46 45 45 10 mg Mean 1.94 2.20 2.09 2.12 2.00 1.88 bid (SD) (0.874) (0.979) (0.955) (1.043) (1.016) (0.970) N 51 51 51 51 50 48 15 mg Mean 1.99 2.25 2.16 2.14 2.18 1.83 bid (SD) (0.877) (0.995) (0.986) (0.957) (0.932) (0.952) N 50 49 49 48 48 47 20 mg Mean 2.04 2.26 2.22 2.19 2.04 1.83 bid (SD) (0.811) (0.936) (0.893) (0.936) (0.996) (0.822) N 57 55 52 51 49 55 #The treatment sample sizes presented in the figure legend represent the number of ITT subjects. Sample sizes at individual time points may be smaller than those in the ITT population due to dropouts or missed assessments.

During double-blind treatment, all the Fampridine-SR groups exhibited mean walking speeds between 2.00 and 2.26 feet per second, while the mean value in the placebo group was consistently about 1.90 feet per second. It should be noted that, at the third stable-dose visit, both the 10 mg bid and 20 mg bid group means dropped-off from what would be expected under the assumption that treatment benefit is consistent over time. This may or may not have been due to chance; further studies should provide additional evidence for either case. After double-blind medication was discontinued, all the treatment groups converged to approximately the same mean value at follow-up.

Results for the primary efficacy variable (percent change in average walking speed during the 12-week stable dose period relative to baseline based on the 25-foot walk) are summarized in FIG. 3. The timed 25 foot walk showed a trend toward increased speed during the stable dose period for all three dose groups, though the average improvement declined during the treatment period, as shown in FIG. 3. The mean percent changes in average walking speed during the 12-week stable dose period (based on adjusted geometric mean change of the log-transformed walking speeds) were 2.5%, 5.5%, 8.4%, and 5.8% for the placebo, 10 mg bid, 15 mg bid, and 20 mg bid groups, respectively. There were no statistical differences between any Fampridine-SR groups and the placebo group.

Results for the protocol specified responder analysis (subjects with average changes in walking speed during the 12 weeks of stable double-blind treatment of at least 20%) are summarized in FIG. 4. The percentages of subjects with average changes in walking speed during the 12-week stable dose period of at least 20% (pre-defined responders) were 12.8%, 23.5%, 26.5%, and 16.1% for the placebo, 10 mg bid, 15 mg bid, and 20 mg bid groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the Fampridine-SR groups and the placebo group.

Descriptive statistics for the average overall Lower Extremity Manual Muscle Testing (LEMMT) by study day are presented in Table 8 and in FIG. 5.

TABLE 8 Average overall LEMMT by Study Day Summary Statistics Over Time Study day Treat- titra- 1st 2nd 3rd follow- ment base tion stbl stbl stbl up placebo Mean 4.05 4.00 4.02 4.03 4.00 4.02 (SD) (0.690) (0.705) (0.687) (0.696) (0.679) (0.738) N# 47 46 46 46 45 45 10 mg Mean 3.98 4.09 4.06 4.09 4.07 3.89 bid (SD) (0.661) (0.641) (0.650) (0.685) (0.642) (0.631) N 51 50 51 51 50 49 15 mg Mean 4.00 4.16 4.11 4.09 4.17 4.08 bid (SD) (0.737) (0.653) (0.645) (0.659) (0.618) (0.674) N 50 49 49 49 49 46 20 mg Mean 3.98 4.08 4.03 3.98 4.07 3.92 bid (SD) (0.634) (0.639) (0.659) (0.714) (0.649) (0.650) N 57 54 52 52 48 55 #The treatment sample sizes presented at individual time points may be smaller than those in the ITT population due to dropouts or missed assessments.

During double-blind treatment, all the Fampridine-SR groups exhibited a numerical pattern of larger mean LEMMT scores than placebo (except the 20 mg bid group at the 2^(nd) stable dose visit). After double-blind medication was discontinued, with the exception of the 15 mg bid group, all the group means were lower than they were at baseline.

Results for the average change in LEMMT during the 12-week stable dose period relative to baseline are summarized in FIG. 6. The mean changes in overall LEMMT during the 12-week stable dose period were −0.05 units, 0.10 units, 0.13 units, and 0.05 units for the placebo, 10 mg bid, 15 mg bid, and 20 mg bid groups, respectively. Improvements in LEMMT were significantly greater in the 10 mg bid and 15 mg bid groups compared to the placebo group; there was no significant difference between the 20 mg bid group and the placebo group.

No statistically significant differences were detected among treatment group based on any of the other secondary efficacy variables, as shown in Table 9.

TABLE 9 Changes in secondary efficacy variables from baseline during the 12-week stable dose period Treatment Group placebo 10 mg bid 15 mg bid 20 mg bid Parameter N = 47 N = 51 N = 50 N = 57 Ashworth Score N 46 51 49 53 Mean (SD) −0.11 (0.377) −0.04 (0.449) −0.06 (0.375) 0.02 (0.466) p-value (each dose vs. placebo) 0.802 0.826 0.275 CGI N 45 50 49 52 Mean (SD) 0.0 (0.66) −0.2 (0.72) −0.1 (0.85) 0.0 (0.78) p-value (each dose vs. placebo) 0.772 0.997 0.996 SGI N 46 50 49 53 Mean (SD) −0.2 (0.96) 0.0 (1.27) −0.1 (1.11) −0.1 (0.86) p-value (each dose vs. placebo) 0.704 0.953 0.968 PASAT N 46 51 49 53 Mean (SD) 2.17 (4.016) 2.13 (3.394) 0.90 (3.274) 0.65 (4.590) p-value (each dose vs. placebo) >0.999 0.306 0.218 MSFC N 46 51 49 52 Mean (SD) 0.08 (0.205) 0.10 (0.310) 0.90 (0.224) 0.06 (0.194) p-value (each dose vs. placebo) 0.977 >0.999 0.968 MSWS-12 N 46 51 49 52 Mean (SD) −3.56 (14.548) −5.53 (16.154) −7.32 (16.295) −5.76 (15.296) p-value (each dose vs. placebo) 0.718 0.445 0.617 Note: The treatment sample sizes presented in the treatment heading represent the number of ITT subjects. Sample sizes for individual variables may be smaller due to dropouts or missed assessments. Note: For each variable, the p-values (versus placebo) are Dunnett-adjusted.

While pre-planned analyses of the primary efficacy endpoint provided insufficient evidence of treatment benefits for any of the Fampridine-SR doses, subsequent analysis revealed the existence of a subset of subjects who responded to the drug with clinical meaningfulness. These subjects exhibited walking speeds while on drug that were consistently better than the fastest walking speeds measured when the subjects were not taking active drug.

The post hoc responder rates based on consistency of improved walking speeds were significantly higher in all three active dose groups (35, 36 and 39%) compared to placebo (9%; p<0.006 for each dose group, adjusting for multiple comparisons) as shown in FIG. 7.

Given that there was little difference in responsiveness between the three doses examined, more detailed analyses were performed comparing the pooled Fampridine-SR treated groups against the placebo-treated group. FIG. 8 summarizes, for the placebo and the pooled Fampridine-SR group, the percentage of post hoc responders. The number of subjects who met the post hoc responder criterion in the pooled Fampridine-SR treated group was 58 (36.7%) compared to 4 (8.5%) in the placebo-treated group, and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).

To validate the clinical meaningfulness of the post hoc responder variable, the 62 responders (58 fampridine and 4 placebo) were compared against the 143 non-responders (100 fampridine and 43 placebo) on the subjective variables to determine if subjects with consistently improved walking speeds during the double-blind could perceived benefit relative to those subjects who did not have consistently improved walking speeds. The results are summarized in FIG. 9 and indicate that consistency in walking speed had clinical meaningfulness for the subjects in this study since the responders had (over the double-blind period) significantly better changes from baseline in MSWS-12 and significantly better subjective global scores. In addition, the responders were rated marginally better than the non-responders by the clinicians during the double-blind. Thus, responders experienced clinically meaningful improvements in their MS symptoms, and treatment with fampridine significantly increased the chances of such a response.

To establish baseline comparability among the responder analysis groups, analyses were performed on the baseline demographic variables, key neurological characteristics and the relevant efficacy variables at baseline. In general, the responder analysis groups were comparable for all demographic and baseline characteristics variables.

Having demonstrated the clinical meaningfulness of consistently improved walking speeds during the double-blind as a criterion for responsiveness, the question of the magnitude of benefit becomes of interest. The fampridine non-responders, although providing no relevant efficacy information, do provide safety information regarding those individuals who are treated with fampridine but show no apparent clinical benefit. As such, responder analyses of these groups were performed.

With respect to magnitude of benefit, FIG. 10 and Table 12 below summarizes the percent changes in walking speed at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping. The mean improvement for the fampridine responders during the double-blind across 14 weeks of treatment ranged from 24.6% to 29.0% compared to 1.7% to 3.7% for the placebo group; this was highly significant (p<0.001) at every visit. Although providing no relevant efficacy information, results for the fampridine non-responders are also illustrated and show that there was, and could be, some worsening in walking speeds after 12-weeks when a non-responder is treated with fampridine. The improvement was stable (±3%) across 14 weeks of treatment, and was associated with improvement in two global measures (Subject Global Impression and Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12). The four placebo responders showed a 19% improvement in walking speed but there were too few subjects in this group for meaningful statistical comparison. Response status was not significantly related to baseline demographics, including type or severity of MS. Adverse events and safety measures were consistent with previous experience for this drug.

TABLE 12 Summary of percent change in Walking Speed at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping. Summary Statistics Over Time Study day Treatment titration 1st stbl 2nd stbl 3rd stbl Placebo Mean 1.7 2.6 1.8 3.7 (SEM) (2.21) (3.23) (3.11) (3.38) N# 47 46 46 45 Fampridine Mean 8.3 3.5 −0.2 −6.5 Non-responders (SEM) (2.05) (1.90) (1.76) (2.49) N 97 94 93 89 Fampridine Mean 27.4 24.6 29.0 27.3 Responders (SEM) (2.43) (2.44) (4.31) (3.52) N 58 58 57 58 FR vs. Placebo p-value{circumflex over ( )} <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 FR vs. FNR p-value{circumflex over ( )} <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 FNR vs. PBO p-value{circumflex over ( )} 0.080 0.884 0.497 0.022 ABBREVIATIONS: FR = Fampridine Responders; FNR = Fampridine Non-responders. #The treatment sample sizes presented at individual time points may be smaller than those in the ITT population due to dropouts or missed assessments. #The treatment sample sizes presented in the figure legend represent the number of ITT subjects. Sample sizes at individual time points may be smaller due to dropouts or missed assessments. {circumflex over ( )}P-values from t-tests of the least-squares means using the mean square error via an ANOVA model with effects for responder analysis grouping and center.

FIG. 11 and Table 13 summarize the changes in LEMMT at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping. The mean improvement for the fampridine responders during the double-blind ranged from 0.09 to 0.18 units compared to −0.04 units at each visit for the placebo group; this was significant at every visit except the second stable dose visit (p=0.106). Although providing no relevant efficacy information, results for the fampridine non-responders are also illustrated and show that there was, and could be, some significant improvement in leg strength when non-responder is treated with fampridine. This suggests that although a clinically meaningful response can be linked to about 37% of subjects treated with Fampridine-SR, additional subjects may have functional improvements on variables other than walking speed.

TABLE 13 Summary of percent change in LEMMT at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping. Summary Statistics Over Time Study day Treatment titration 1st stbl 2nd stbl 3rd stbl Placebo Mean −0.04 −0.04 −0.04 −0.04 (SEM) (0.035) (0.042) (0.039) (0.042) N# 46 46 46 45 Fampridine Mean 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.10 Non-responders (SEM) (0.028) (0.033) (0.036) (0.038) N 95 94 94 89 Fampridine Mean 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.17 Responders (SEM) (0.029) (0.032) (0.043) (0.045) N 58 58 58 58 FR vs. Placebo p-value{circumflex over ( )} <0.001 0.023 0.106 0.004 FR vs. FNR p-value{circumflex over ( )} 0.178 0.627 0.739 0.311 FNR vs. PBO p-value{circumflex over ( )} <0.001 0.003 0.038 0.032 ABBREVIATIONS: FR = Fampridine Responders; FNR = Fampridine Non-responders. #The treatment sample sizes presented at individual time points may be smaller than those in the ITT population due to dropouts or missed assessments. Treatment sample sizes presented in the figure legend represent the number of ITT subjects. Sample sizes at individual time points may be smaller due to dropouts or missed assessments. {circumflex over ( )}P-values from t-tests of the least-squares means using the mean square error via an ANOVA model with effects for responder analysis grouping and center.

FIG. 12 and Table 14, below, summarize the changes in Overall Ashworth Score at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping. The mean reduction from baseline (indicative of improvement) for the fampridine responders during the double-blind ranged from −0.18 to −0.11 units compared to −0.11 to −0.06 for the placebo group. The fampridine responders were numerically superior to placebo but there was insufficient evidence to detect significant differences. Although appearing to provide little relevant efficacy information, results for the fampridine non-responders are also illustrated.

TABLE 14 Summary of change in overall Ashworth score at each double-blind visit by responder analysis grouping. Summary Statistics Over Time Study day Treatment titration 1st stbl 2nd stbl 3rd stbl Placebo Mean −0.06 −0.11 −0.06 −0.13 (SEM) (0.069) (0.073) (0.070) (0.073) N# 46 46 46 45 Fampridine Mean −0.16 −0.08 −0.07 0.00 Non-responders (SEM) (0.044) (0.053) (0.054) (0.056) N 95 94 94 89 Fampridine Mean −0.14 −0.18 −0.11 −0.18 Responders (SEM) (0.058) (0.066) (0.060) (0.055) N 58 58 58 58 FR vs. Placebo p-value{circumflex over ( )} 0.343 0.374 0.717 0.680 FR vs. FNR p-value{circumflex over ( )} 0.675 0.210 0.911 0.064 FNR vs. PBO p-value{circumflex over ( )} 0.151 0.823 0.772 0.189 ABBREVIATIONS: FR = Fampridine Responders; FNR = Fampridine Non-responders. #The treatment sample sizes presented at individual time points may be smaller than those in the ITT population due to dropouts or missed assessments. {circumflex over ( )}P-values from t-tests of the least-squares means using the mean square error via an ANOVA model with effects for responder analysis grouping and center.

Adverse events most commonly reported prior to treatment were accidental injury, reported by 12 (5.8%) subjects, nausea, reported by 9 (4.4%) subjects, and asthenia, diarrhea, and paresthesia, each reported by 8 (3.9%) subjects. Six (2.9%) subjects also reported headache, anxiety, dizziness, diarrhea, and peripheral edema. These adverse events are indicative of the medical conditions affecting people with MS.

Conclusions. The data does not appear to support either a number of anecdotal reports or expectations from preclinical pharmacology that doses higher than about 10 to 15 mg b.i.d., and even about 10 mg b.i.d., should be associated with greater efficacy. The data presented below in Table 15 support this, based on the new responder analysis methodology.

TABLE 15 Comparison of 10 mg vs. 15 mg among Responders 10 mg 15 mg (N = 51) (N = 50) Responders N (%) 18 (35.3) 18 (36.0) Average % CFB in Walk 27.6% (18.39) 29.6% (22.43) Speed: Mean (SD) % Change in Walk Speed 26%-32% 27%-31% by Visit: minimum-maximum Average SGI 4.8 (1.09) 4.7 (1.09) Average Change in MSWS-12 * −11.1 (21.9) −7.8 (19.6) * For the average change in the MSWS-12, a negative score is indicative of subjective improvement.

A responder analysis based on consistency of improvement provides a sensitive, meaningful approach to measuring effects on the timed 25 foot walk and may be used as a primary endpoint for future trials. This data suggest that for responsive subjects (approximately 37%), treatment with fampridine at doses of 10-20 mg bid produces substantial and persistent improvement in walking.

Efficacy. There are no notable differences between 10 mg bid and 15 mg bid among subjects who respond to drug. In fact, the largest difference, favors the 10 mg bid group (see MSWS-12 result).

Safety. With respect to safety, there are three considerations: There was an apparent decline below baseline walking speed at the last visit on drug in the fampridine non-responders in the 10 mg bid and 20 mg bid groups, but not the 15 mg bid group. This may or may not be significant, but is not clearly dose related. There was an apparent rebound effect, with walking speed dropping below baseline, among fampridine treated subjects at the two week follow-up visit; this occurred in the 15 and 20 mg but not the 10 mg bid group. Serious AE's were more frequent in the 15 mg and 20 mg bid groups 10% and 12% rates vs. 0% rate in 10 mg bid and 4% in placebo groups. This may or may not be significant, but the risk of potentially related SAEs, particularly seizures appears to be dose-related from all available data and based on mechanism of action. Based on this data, it would appear that a 10 mg bid dose is preferred because of its favorable risk to benefit ratio compared with the 15 and 20 mg doses.

Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, other versions are possible. Therefore the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description and the preferred versions contain within this specification. 

We claim:
 1. A method of improving lower extremity function in a human multiple sclerosis patient in need thereof comprising orally administering to said patient a sustained release composition of less than 15 milligrams of 4-aminopyridine twice daily for a time period of at least two weeks, wherein the amount of said 4-aminopyridine administered to said patient in each said administering step is the same over said time period.
 2. A method of improving lower extremity function in a human multiple sclerosis patient in need thereof comprising orally administering to said patient a sustained release composition of 10 milligrams of 4-aminopyridine twice daily for a time period of at least two weeks.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the improving lower extremity function in the patient is increasing walking speed of the patient.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the lower extremity function is lower extremity muscle strength.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the lower extremity function is lower extremity muscle tone.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said method comprises initiating treatment of said patient with 4-aminopyridine by orally administering said sustained release composition twice daily to said patient.
 7. The method of claim 2, wherein said method comprises initiating treatment of said patient with 4-aminopyridine by orally administering said sustained release composition twice daily to said patient.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein twice daily is about every 12 hours.
 9. The method of claim 2, wherein twice daily is about every 12 hours.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said sustained release composition is a tablet.
 11. The method of claim 2, wherein said sustained release composition is a tablet.
 12. The method of claim 8, wherein said sustained release composition is a tablet.
 13. The method of claim 9, wherein said sustained release composition is a tablet.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein said sustained release composition provides a release profile to obtain a C_(avSS) of about 15 ng/ml to about 35 ng/ml.
 15. The method of claim 2, wherein said sustained release composition provides a release profile to obtain a C_(avSS) of about 15 ng/ml to about 35 ng/ml.
 16. The method of claim 1, wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 6 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 17. The method of claim 2, wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 6 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 18. The method of claim 1, wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 5.2 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 19. The method of claim 2, wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 5.2 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 20. The method of claim 1, wherein said sustained release composition is capable of providing, upon administration to the patient, a release profile of the 4-aminopyridine extending over at least 6 hours.
 21. The method of claim 2, wherein said sustained release composition is capable of providing, upon administration to the patient, a release profile of the 4-aminopyridine extending over at least 6 hours.
 22. The method of claim 1, wherein said 4-aminopyridine is dispersed in a rate of release controlling polymer.
 23. The method of claim 2, wherein said 4-aminopyridine is dispersed in a rate of release controlling polymer.
 24. The method of claim 1, wherein said sustained release composition comprises a matrix, in which said 4-aminopyridine is uniformly dispersed, that is suitable for controlling the release rate of the 4-aminopyridine.
 25. The method of claim 2, wherein said sustained release composition comprises a matrix, in which said 4-aminopyridine is uniformly dispersed, that is suitable for controlling the release rate of the 4-aminopyridine.
 26. The method of claim 1, wherein said patient has relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
 27. The method of claim 2, wherein said patient has relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
 28. The method of claim 1, wherein said time period is more than two weeks.
 29. The method of claim 2, wherein said time period is more than two weeks.
 30. The method of claim 1, wherein said time period comprises twelve weeks.
 31. The method of claim 2, wherein said time period comprises twelve weeks.
 32. The method of claim 1, wherein the lower extremity function is walking.
 33. The method of claim 32, wherein said method comprises initiating treatment of said patient with 4-aminopyridine by orally administering said sustained release composition twice daily to said patient.
 34. The method of claim 32, wherein said sustained release composition is a tablet, and wherein twice daily is about every 12 hours.
 35. The method of claim 32, wherein said sustained release composition provides a release profile to obtain a C_(avSS) of about 15 ng/ml to about 35 ng/ml.
 36. The method of claim 2, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said sustained release composition provides a release profile to obtain a C_(avSS) of about 15 ng/ml to about 35 ng/ml.
 37. The method of claim 32, wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean _(Tmax) in a range of about 2 to about 6 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 38. The method of claim 2, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 6 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 39. The method of claim 32, wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 5.2 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 40. The method of claim 34, wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 5.2 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 41. The method of claim 2, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said sustained release composition provides a mean T_(max) in a range of about 2 to about 5.2 hours after administration of the sustained release composition to the patient.
 42. The method of claim 32, wherein said sustained release composition comprises a matrix, in which said 4-aminopyridine is uniformly dispersed, that is suitable for controlling the release rate of the 4-aminopyridine.
 43. The method of claim 2, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said sustained release composition comprises a matrix, in which said 4-aminopyridine is uniformly dispersed, that is suitable for controlling the release rate of the 4-aminopyridine.
 44. The method of claim 32, wherein said time period is more than two weeks.
 45. The method of claim 2, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said time period is more than two weeks.
 46. The method of claim 32, wherein said time period comprises twelve weeks.
 47. The method of claim 40, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said time period comprises twelve weeks.
 48. The method of claim 32, wherein said sustained release composition is capable of providing, upon administration to the patient, a release profile of the 4-aminopyridine extending over at least 6 hours.
 49. The method of claim 2, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said sustained release composition is capable of providing, upon administration to the patient, a release profile of the 4-aminopyridine extending over at least 6 hours.
 50. The method of claim 32, wherein said 4-aminopyridine is dispersed in a rate of release controlling polymer.
 51. The method of claim 2, wherein the lower extremity function is walking, and wherein said 4-aminopyridine is dispersed in a rate of release controlling polymer.
 52. The method of claim 32, wherein said patient has relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. 